
% Table created by stargazer v.5.2.3 by Marek Hlavac, Social Policy Institute. E-mail: marek.hlavac at gmail.com
% Date and time: Sat, Mar 16, 2024 - 22:07:29
\begin{table}[!htbp] \centering 
  \caption{The effect of UPR Shaming on incumbent voting (CSES)} 
  \label{tab:H1_OLS} 
\begin{tabular}{@{\extracolsep{5pt}}lccc} 
\\[-1.8ex]\hline 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\\[-1.8ex] & \multicolumn{3}{c}{Incumbent vote} \\ 
\\[-1.8ex] & (1) & (2) & (3)\\ 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
 UPR Shaming (t-1) & 0.0004 & 0.001$^{**}$ & 0.001$^{*}$ \\ 
  & (0.0003) & (0.0003) & (0.0003) \\ 
  & & & \\ 
Individual-level Controls & No & Yes & Yes \\ 
Physical Integrity (t-1) & No & No & Yes \\ 
State Capacity (t-1) & No & No & Yes \\ 
Year FEs & Yes & Yes & Yes \\ 
Country FEs & Yes & Yes & Yes \\ 
\textit{N} & 120,277 & 120,277 & 120,277 \\ 
\hline 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\multicolumn{4}{c} {\parbox[t]{12cm}{ \textit{Notes:} Robust standard errors are clustered
at the country-year level. Missing data for control variables is imputed 
(average value by country-year).
* $p < .1$, ** $p < .05$, *** $p < .01$}} \\
\end{tabular} 
\end{table} 
